Indian Polity · Polity
With reference to daughters' coparcenary rights under the Hindu Succession Act, which statement is NOT factually correct according to the Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020)?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1The coparcenary right is by birth, and the father need not have been alive on the date the amendment came into force
- 2A daughter cannot claim inheritance rights if her father had expired prior to September 9, 2005✓
- 3A daughter remains a coparcener throughout her life, whether born before or after the 2005 amendment
- 4The Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005 granted daughters equal coparcenary rights with male siblings
Correct answer
A daughter cannot claim inheritance rights if her father had expired prior to September 9, 2005
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity