Social Science · Legal Aptitude
Regarding daughters' coparcenary rights under the Hindu Succession Act, which of the following statements is FALSE following the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020)?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1A daughter remains a coparcener throughout her life, whether the father was alive or not on the date of the 2005 amendment.
- 2Daughters whose fathers died before September 9, 2005 cannot claim the benefit of the 2005 amendment.✓
- 3The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 gave daughters equal coparcenary rights with male siblings.
- 4The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 provides daughters the right to ask for maintenance from a joint Hindu family.
Correct answer
Daughters whose fathers died before September 9, 2005 cannot claim the benefit of the 2005 amendment.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Social Science?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Legal Aptitude MCQs →Want more practice questions on Legal Aptitude?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Social Science · Legal Aptitude