Consider the following statements: Statement I: Under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), grant of bail is subject to stricter conditions than under ordinary criminal law, notably Section 43D(5). Statement II: The Supreme Court has held that prolonged incarceration without trial can be a ground for granting bail despite the statutory restrictions of the UAPA. Statement III: Courts differentiate between the roles of alleged conspirators, such as 'architects' and 'facilitators', while assessing culpability and bail pleas in conspiracy-related offences. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Question

Indian Polity · Polity

Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View

Share:

Correct answer

Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, but only one of them explains Statement I.

Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.

👥

Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!

Online Test Series

Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.

Chapter Practice

Want more practice questions on Polity?

Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.

Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity

The arrival of which commission in India triggered widespread protests, including mass hartals across the country in 1928?

Which of the following leaders was instrumental in initiating and leading India’s struggle for independence?

Answer 1

Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, and both of them explain Statement I.

Answer 2

Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, but only one of them explains Statement I.

Answer 3

Only one of the Statements II and III is correct, and that explains Statement I.

Answer 4

Neither Statement II nor Statement III is correct.

Related Practice Questions