नीचे दो कथन दिए गए हैं: कथन I: न्याय दर्शन के अनुसार, कोई तर्क उन मुद्दों पर आगे नहीं बढ़ता है जो पहले से ही भली-भांति स्थापित (सिद्ध) हैं। कथन II: न्याय दर्शन के अनुसार, कोई तर्क केवल उन्हीं मुद्दों पर आगे बढ़ सकता है जो पूरी तरह से और अत्यंत अज्ञात हैं। उपरोक्त कथनों के आलोक में, नीचे दिए गए विकल्पों में से सबसे उपयुक्त उत्तर चुनें:

Which of the following statements is true regarding the Nyaya view of invariable concomitance (Vyapti)? (A) It is determined by an inductive process of reasoning which corresponds to Mill's method of agreement and method of difference. (B) It is based on the concomitance of affirmatives (Anvaya) that wherever a product exists, its material cause exists. (C) It is based on the concomitance of negatives (Vyatireka) that wherever a material cause does not exist, its product does not exist. (D) The Nyaya view of the inductive process does not correspond to Mill's method of agreement and method of difference. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

'The world is an effect, and hence it must have an efficient and intelligent cause. That efficient and intelligent cause is God.' Which source of knowledge (pramana) is primarily used in this argument according to the classical Indian School of Logic (Nyaya)?