अर्ध-अनुबंधों (Quasi-Contracts) के संबंध में निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए: I. पारंपरिक दृष्टिकोण के अनुसार, अर्ध-अनुबंध का न्यायिक आधार अनचित लाभ (unjust enrichment) को रोकना है। II. सामान्य अपकृत्य के विपरीत, अर्ध-अनुबंधों में वसूली योग्य राशि आमतौर पर एक निर्धारित/निश्चित राशि (liquidated sum) होती है। III. अर्ध-अनुबंध और अपकृत्य दोनों में दायित्व कानून द्वारा लगाया जाता है और यह किसी समझौते के तहत उत्पन्न नहीं होता है। उपरोक्त कथनों में से कौन सा/से सही है/हैं?

Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R. Assertion A: A voidable contract, much like a void contract, is treated as fundamentally flawed and lacks any legal validity or enforceability right from the moment of its inception. Reason R: A voidable contract remains legally valid and enforceable until the aggrieved party, often a victim of duress or fraud, exercises their legal right to either formally affirm or reject the agreement. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R. Assertion A: A contract labeled as 'void ab initio' is initially legally effective and can be enforced in a court of law until one party exercises their option to void it. Reason R: The legal doctrine 'void ab initio' translates to 'void from the beginning,' describing a contract that is fundamentally flawed and entirely legally ineffective from the exact moment of its inception. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below: