English Language · English
Which of the following findings, if true, would most effectively weaken the author's central assertion that investing in child nutrition is 'the most profitable, high-return infrastructure investment available'?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Data indicates that the majority of the 3.5 trillion dollar cost of inaction is attributable to non-communicable diseases related to modern nutritional excesses, not the child undernutrition discussed in the passage.
- 2The costs associated with political volatility and cross-border coordination consistently elevate the true delivery cost of RUTFs by over 75% across the global supply chain.
- 3A new, independently verified study reveals that the calculated return of 16 to 23 dollars per dollar invested is frequently offset by high youth unemployment rates stemming from systemic lack of post-school job creation in targeted regions.✓
- 4Technological advances in cold-chain logistics have recently made RUTFs non-temperature-sensitive, eliminating one of the three systemic barriers cited in the passage.
Correct answer
A new, independently verified study reveals that the calculated return of 16 to 23 dollars per dollar invested is frequently offset by high youth unemployment rates stemming from systemic lack of post-school job creation in targeted regions.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for English Language?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice English MCQs →Want more practice questions on English?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in English Language · English