Indian Polity · Polity
Which of the following correctly reflects the constitutional implication of Article 255 regarding the requirement of prior recommendation and subsequent assent to bills?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1The President's previous sanction must precede the legislative introduction, and subsequent assent cannot cure the omission.
- 2An Act is not invalidated merely because some recommendation or previous sanction required by the Constitution was not given, provided subsequent assent was accorded by the President or the Governor.✓
- 3Express written reference to the prior recommendation must be written on the face of the bill for it to be valid.
- 4No Act of Parliament or a State Legislature is void solely because the Governor did not sign it in person.
Correct answer
An Act is not invalidated merely because some recommendation or previous sanction required by the Constitution was not given, provided subsequent assent was accorded by the President or the Governor.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity