Philosophy · Informal Fallacies
Which of the following arguments exhibit premises that are completely irrelevant to the conclusion (Fallacies of Relevance)? (A) Dogs are cats, cats are felines so dogs are felines. (B) Althea is two years old. So, Althea probably goes to college. (C) Chris is a woman. Therefore, Chris enjoys knitting. (D) Marty is a high-school senior. So, Marty likely has a Ph.D. (E) All dogs have five legs. Rover is a dog. So Rover has five legs. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1(B) and (D) Only✓
- 2(A) and (E) Only
- 3(C) and (E) Only
- 4(A) and (C) Only
Correct answer
(B) and (D) Only
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Philosophy?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Informal Fallacies MCQs →Want more practice questions on Informal Fallacies?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Philosophy · Informal Fallacies