English Language · English

Which choice best describes a difference in how the authors of Text 1 and Text 2 view Barbara Tuchman's 'The Guns of August'? Text 1 Despite its beautiful prose, 'The Guns of August', Barbara Tuchman's 1962 analysis of the start of World War I, has certain weaknesses as a work of history. It fails to address events in Eastern Europe just before the outbreak of hostilities, thereby giving the impression that Germany was the war's principal instigator. Had Tuchman consulted secondary works available to her by scholars such as Luigi Albertini, she would not have neglected the influence of events in Eastern Europe on Germany's actions. Text 2 Barbara Tuchman's 'The Guns of August' is an engrossing if dated introduction to World War I. Tuchman's analysis of primary documents is laudable, but her main thesis that European powers committed themselves to a catastrophic outcome by refusing to deviate from military plans developed prior to the conflict is implausibly reductive.