History · Mauryan Empire
When analyzing the Arthashastra, attributed to Kautilya, as a historical source for understanding Mauryan administration, which critical historiographical distinction must be made?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1It was written centuries after the fall of the Mughal Empire and has no relevance to ancient Indian history
- 2It is primarily a normative and prescriptive treatise on statecraft and governance, which may not always reflect exact historical realities on the ground✓
- 3It represents a complete and literal word-for-word transcript of daily court procedures under Chandragupta Maurya
- 4It should be treated as a purely fictional, dramatic work with no historical value
Correct answer
It is primarily a normative and prescriptive treatise on statecraft and governance, which may not always reflect exact historical realities on the ground
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for History?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Mauryan Empire MCQs →Want more practice questions on Mauryan Empire?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in History · Mauryan Empire