English Language · Reading Comprehension
What is a primary pragmatic argument against aggressive 'eradicate with prejudice' policies for invasive species?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1The cost of chemical eradication measures always bankrupts environmental protection agencies.
- 2All non-native species naturally transition into native species within a few decades.
- 3Eradication programs often incur collateral damage, affecting non-target 'bystander' species and surrounding environmental resources.✓
- 4The emotional suffering of non-native species is the sole determinant of environmental policy.
Correct answer
Eradication programs often incur collateral damage, affecting non-target 'bystander' species and surrounding environmental resources.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for English Language?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Reading Comprehension MCQs →Want more practice questions on Reading Comprehension?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in English Language · Reading Comprehension