English Language · English
What can be inferred from discussions of 'deliberate ambiguity' in statutory drafting with respect to strict textualism?
- 1Political compromise is only possible when the judiciary agrees to abstain from interpreting the Constitution.
- 2Lawmakers are generally incompetent and unable to write clear statutes without the assistance of executive agency experts.
- 3Purposivism is an invalid approach because it prevents judges from understanding the mathematical precision of the law.
- 4Strict textualism fails because it assumes a level of linguistic precision that lawmakers intentionally avoided in order to pass the legislation.✓
Correct answer
Strict textualism fails because it assumes a level of linguistic precision that lawmakers intentionally avoided in order to pass the legislation.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for English Language?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on English?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in English Language · English