Under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, expert opinion is relevant upon points of foreign law, science, art, and identity of handwriting or finger impressions. Which of the following is NOT a point mentioned under this section?

While lodging an FIR for a suspicious loitering incident, a security guard's testimony states that he saw the suspect flee but did not directly witness the unlawful act. This constitutes which type of evidence?

A security guard relays second-hand information from a colleague about witnessing a break-in while lodging an FIR. This type of information is typically inadmissible in court under which category of evidence?