Law · Legal Aptitude
Sunil sends UnReal a third blocking order. UnReal claims that this order too was invalid. Upset with UnReal for claiming that all his blocking orders were invalid, Sunil sends them a letter in which he says, 'If you do not comply with my blocking orders, then I will be forced to initiate criminal proceedings against you and cancel your safe harbour immunity.' UnReal claims that Sunil has broken the law by making these statements in the letter. Is UnReal right?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1No, since the IT Act does not forbid Sunil from doing so.✓
- 2Yes, since Sunil did not have the power to cancel UnReal's safe harbour immunity.
- 3No, since Sunil had issued blocking orders in the past as well, and UnReal should have complied with the orders without questioning them.
- 4Yes, since making such threats amounts to intimidation.
Correct answer
No, since the IT Act does not forbid Sunil from doing so.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Legal Aptitude MCQs →Want more practice questions on Legal Aptitude?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Legal Aptitude