General Studies · Statement and Argument
Statement: Is it advisable to reduce the subsidy on cooking gas further? Arguments: I. Yes, any subsidy depletes the natural resources; hence, consumers alone should bear the burden of the actual cost. II. No, this may lead to a sharp increase in commodity prices, thereby adversely impacting inflation rates. Which of the arguments is/are strong?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Only argument I is strong
- 2Only argument II is strong✓
- 3Both I and II are strong
- 4Neither I nor II is strong
Correct answer
Only argument II is strong
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for General Studies?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Statement and Argument MCQs →Want more practice questions on Statement and Argument?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in General Studies · Statement and Argument