Indian Polity · Polity
Read the following statements regarding the 'Doctrine of Repugnancy' (Article 254): Statement I: If a 'State law' on a 'Concurrent List' subject conflicts with a 'Union law', then the Union law prevails, and the State law becomes 'void' to the extent of the repugnancy. Statement II: A State law on a Concurrent subject that conflicts with a Union law can still prevail within that State if it has been reserved for and received the assent of the President. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Neither Statement I nor II is correct
- 2Both Statements I and II are correct✓
- 3Only Statement II is correct
- 4Only Statement I is correct
Correct answer
Both Statements I and II are correct
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity