Law · Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the commencement of arbitral proceedings is not dependent on interim relief being allowed or denied under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
- 1Magma Leasing Ltd. v. NEPC Micon Ltd.
- 2National Thermal Power Corporation v. Flowmore (P) Ltd.
- 3M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
- 4Firm Ashok Traders & Another v. Gurumukh Das Saluja & Others✓
Correct answer
Firm Ashok Traders & Another v. Gurumukh Das Saluja & Others
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996