Law · Negotiable Instruments Act
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that in matters arising from the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, successive sentences may be directed to run concurrently if both transactions are part of a single transaction?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Shyam Pal Vs. Dayawati Besoya & Ors. (2016)✓
- 2Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Rajiv Dubey (2009)
- 3Don Ayengia Vs. State of Assam & Ors. (2016)
- 4Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010)
Correct answer
Shyam Pal Vs. Dayawati Besoya & Ors. (2016)
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Negotiable Instruments Act MCQs →Want more practice questions on Negotiable Instruments Act?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Negotiable Instruments Act