In this question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given arguments, if any, is strong. Statement: Should those without a college degree be barred from voting in elections? Arguments: I. Yes. It is better to have a learned electorate. II. No. An informed electorate is all that is required and not necessarily those with a college degree, and for sharing of information a basic education is enough.

In the question below, a statement is followed by two arguments, I and II. You must decide which of the given arguments is 'strong'. Statement: Should Indian scientists working abroad be called back to India? Arguments: I. Yes. They must serve the motherland first and forget about discoveries, honours, facilities and all. II. No. We have enough talent; let them stay where they want.

Decide which argument is stronger according to the given statement. Statement: Should the system of Lok Adalats and mobile courts be encouraged in India? Arguments: I. No. These courts are generally biased in their judgments. II. Yes. They help in providing speedy justice to the common people. III. Yes. This will reduce the burden on higher courts, especially in minor cases.