Law · Limitation Act, 1963
In Craft Centre v. Koncherry Coir Factories (1990), what did the Kerala High Court emphasize regarding the burden of proof under the Limitation Act?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1If a suit is barred by time, the court is not obligated to dismiss it even at the appellate stage.
- 2The provision of Section 3 regarding limitation is merely discretionary and not mandatory.
- 3If the suit is out of time, the plaintiff is not required to plead or prove acknowledgments relied upon to save the limitation.
- 4The plaintiff's duty is to convince the Court that the suit is within the prescribed time limit.✓
Correct answer
The plaintiff's duty is to convince the Court that the suit is within the prescribed time limit.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Limitation Act, 1963 MCQs →Want more practice questions on Limitation Act, 1963?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Limitation Act, 1963