Philosophy · Classical Indian Logic (Anumana)
Given below are two statements regarding the Indian logical concept of Vyapti: Statement I: The relation of invariable concomitance is the relation between Hetu and Sadhya which requires no qualifying term or limitation (Upadhi), e.g., 'wherever there is smoke there is fire'. Statement II: The relation of invariable concomitance is the relation between Hetu and Paksha which requires a qualifying term or limitation (Upadhi), e.g., 'wherever there is fire there is smoke'. In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Both Statement I and Statement II are correct
- 2Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect
- 3Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect✓
- 4Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
Correct answer
Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Philosophy?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Classical Indian Logic (Anumana) MCQs →Want more practice questions on Classical Indian Logic (Anumana)?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Philosophy · Classical Indian Logic (Anumana)