English Language · English
Foreign peacekeepers often exist in a bubble in the poor countries where they are deployed; they live in posh compounds, drive fancy vehicles, and distance themselves from locals. This may be partially justified because they perform an emotionally draining job under constant fear. However, they are often despised by locals. A better solution would be bottom-up peacebuilding, involving more time working with communities to earn their trust, rather than only meeting government officials. Which option best summarizes this passage?
- 1The environment in poor countries has tended to make foreign peacekeeping forces live in enclaves, but it is time to change this scenario.
- 2Peacekeeping duties would be more effectively performed by local residents given their better understanding, knowledge and rapport with their own communities.
- 3Peacekeeping forces in foreign countries have tended to be aloof for valid reasons but would be more effective if they worked more closely with local communities.✓
- 4Extravagant lifestyles and an aloof attitude among the foreigners working as peacekeepers in poor countries have justifiably made them the target of local anger.
Correct answer
Peacekeeping forces in foreign countries have tended to be aloof for valid reasons but would be more effective if they worked more closely with local communities.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for English Language?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on English?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in English Language · English