General Studies · Syllogism
Determine which of the given statements logically supports the conclusions. Conclusions: I. Some Swiggy are Blinkit. II. Some UberEats are not Dunzo. Statements: I. Some Zomato are Swiggy. All Swiggy are Blinkit. No Blinkit are UberEats. All UberEats are Dunzo. II. Only a few Zomato are Swiggy. All Swiggy are Blinkit. Some Blinkit are UberEats. Only a few UberEats are Dunzo. III. Some Zomato are Swiggy. Some Blinkit are Swiggy. Some Blinkit are UberEats. Some UberEats are Dunzo. IV. No Zomato are Swiggy. No Swiggy are Blinkit. Only a few Blinkit are UberEats. All UberEats are Dunzo.
- 1Both statements I and IV
- 2Only statement III
- 3Only statement II✓
- 4Only statement I
Correct answer
Only statement II
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for General Studies?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on Syllogism?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in General Studies · Syllogism