Indian Polity · Polity
Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Twenty-Fourth Constitutional Amendment Act was enacted to place beyond doubt the amending power of Parliament in respect of all provisions of the Constitution. Statement-II: In I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court had taken the view that Parliament could not amend the Fundamental Rights by resorting to its constituent power. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
- 2Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
- 3Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct but Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I
- 4Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I✓
Correct answer
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity