Indian Polity · Polity
Consider the following statements regarding the Sabarimala Temple case and constitutional provisions: Statement I: The Supreme Court in the Sabarimala case examined the interplay between Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution concerning religious freedom and denominational rights. Statement II: Article 25 guarantees freedom of religion but is subject to public order, morality, health, and other Fundamental Rights. Statement III: Article 26 grants absolute autonomy to religious denominations, making their practices immune from constitutional scrutiny. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Neither Statement II nor Statement III is correct.
- 2Only one of the Statements II and III is correct, and that explains Statement I.
- 3Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, but only one of them explains Statement I.✓
- 4Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, and both of them explain Statement I.
Correct answer
Both Statement II and Statement III are correct, but only one of them explains Statement I.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity