Indian Polity · Polity
Consider the following statements regarding the Matua community's protest in West Bengal: Statement I: A section of the Matua community in West Bengal has launched a hunger strike demanding unconditional citizenship for uprooted refugees. Statement II: The protesters allege that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process of the electoral rolls may remove the names of uprooted and marginalized minorities, including doubtful voters. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.✓
- 2Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.
- 3Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.
- 4Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.
Correct answer
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity