Current Affairs · Judiciary & Law
Consider the following statements regarding the legal jurisprudence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967: Statement I: The Supreme Court has held that even the preparation or conspiracy to commit a terror act can constitute a punishable offence under the UAPA. Statement II: The Court ruled that an accused can only be charged under the UAPA if the act of terrorism has been successfully executed and results in actual casualties. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.
- 2Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.✓
- 3Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.
- 4Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.
Correct answer
Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Current Affairs?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Judiciary & Law MCQs →Want more practice questions on Judiciary & Law?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Current Affairs · Judiciary & Law