Consider the following statements regarding the functioning of Information Commissions under the RTI Act, 2005: Statement I: The RTI Act permits State Governments to confer additional appellate jurisdiction on State Human Rights Commissions to function as Chief Information Commissioners whenever vacancies arise in the State Information Commission. Statement II: The RTI Act envisages a distinct statutory architecture for Information Commissions, and any ad-hoc substitution of appellate authority requires legislative backing rather than mere executive directions. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Question

Indian Polity · Polity

Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View

Share:

Correct answer

Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.

Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.

👥

Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!

Online Test Series

Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.

Chapter Practice

Want more practice questions on Polity?

Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.

Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity

Mahatma Gandhi's last fast unto death in 1948 was primarily against which of the following?

What was the primary meaning of 'Swaraj' as popularized by Mahatma Gandhi during India's independence movement?

What was one major impact of India’s independence on its economy?

Answer 1

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.

Answer 2

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.

Answer 3

Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.

Answer 4

Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct.

Related Practice Questions