Indian Polity · Polity
Consider the following statements regarding the 'Doctrine of Repugnancy' (Article 254): 1. If a State law on a Concurrent List subject conflicts with a Union law, then the Union law prevails, and the State law becomes void to the extent of the repugnancy. 2. A State law on a Concurrent subject that conflicts with a Union law cannot prevail within that State even if it has been reserved for and received the assent of the President. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Neither Statement 1 nor 2 is correct
- 2Both Statements 1 and 2 are correct
- 3Only Statement 2 is correct
- 4Only Statement 1 is correct✓
Correct answer
Only Statement 1 is correct
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Indian Polity?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Polity MCQs →Want more practice questions on Polity?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Indian Polity · Polity