Current Affairs · Constitutional Challenges and Personal Laws

Consider the following arguments and constitutional principles relevant to legal challenges regarding the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954: I. The requirement for a mandatory 30-day public notice and invitation of objections prior to the solemnization of marriage under the Act. II. The protection of individual autonomy, dignity, and decisional privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. III. The inherent judicial review power of the High Courts and Supreme Court to test the constitutional validity of parliamentary laws. IV. The constitutional mandate that all religious personal laws must also include an identical prior public notice period before any marriage. How many of the above components constitute core elements in the ongoing constitutional challenge to the notice provisions of the Special Marriage Act?