Assertion (A): Malice in law operates on the premise that certain acts are inherently wrong, and malicious intent is inferred legally without needing to prove personal ill-will. Reason (R): Malice in fact requires proof of specific improper intent, personal spite, or ill-will towards the plaintiff.

Question

Law · Law of Torts

Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View

Share:

Correct answer

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)

Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.

👥

Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!

Online Test Series

Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.

Chapter Practice

Want more practice questions on Law of Torts?

Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.

Recommended practice questions in Law · Law of Torts

The arrival of which commission in India triggered widespread protests, including mass hartals across the country in 1928?

Which of the following leaders was instrumental in initiating and leading India’s struggle for independence?

Which of the following viceroys of India is associated with the 'Ilbert Bill' controversy?

Answer 1

Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Answer 2

Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)

Answer 3

(A) is true, but (R) is false

Answer 4

(A) is false, but (R) is true

Related Practice Questions