Law · Law of Torts
Assertion (A): In Nocton v. Lord Ashburton, the solicitor was held liable for negligently inducing a client to release part of a mortgage security. Reason (R): Unlike in Derry v. Peek, the circumstances in Nocton v. Lord Ashburton showed there was a fiduciary relationship establishing a specific duty of care. Which one of the following options is correct?
- 1Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true
- 2Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false
- 3Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)
- 4Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
Correct answer
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on Law of Torts?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Law of Torts