Law · Banking Law
Assertion (A): A collecting banker can be held liable for conversion to the true owner of a cheque if the banker collects a cheque for a customer who has no title or a defective title to the instrument. Reasoning (R): The Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 provides a specific statutory protection under Section 131 that effectively shifts the burden of proof to the true owner to demonstrate that the banker acted with gross negligence or bad faith during the collection process.
- 1A is false but R is true.
- 2A is true but R is false.✓
- 3Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- 4Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Correct answer
A is true but R is false.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Want more practice questions on Banking Law?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Banking Law