Law · Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Anything discovered in consequence of information received from an accused may be proved under the proviso of Section 23(2) of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. In which case did the Supreme Court hold the presence of two independent witnesses essential at the time of receiving information and discovery of a thing on such information?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Subramanya v. State of Karnataka AIR 2022 SC 5110
- 2State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram (2023) 8 SCC 180
- 3Ramanand alias Nandlal Bharti v. State of U.P. AIR 2022 SC 5273✓
- 4Chandrapal v. State of Chhattisgarh, AIR 2022 SC 2542
Correct answer
Ramanand alias Nandlal Bharti v. State of U.P. AIR 2022 SC 5273
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam MCQs →Want more practice questions on Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam