According to the ruling in Collector and Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Darshan Singh and others (AIR 1999), what stance did the court take regarding the non-availability of the case file to the State counsel or Panel lawyer?

Question

Law · Limitation Act, 1963

Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View

Share:

Correct answer

Non-availability of the case file does not constitute a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.

Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.

👥

Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!

Online Test Series

Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.

Chapter Practice

Want more practice questions on Limitation Act, 1963?

Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.

Recommended practice questions in Law · Limitation Act, 1963

Which of the following territories was annexed by Lord Dalhousie under the pretext of misgovernance, and not directly through the Doctrine of Lapse?

What was the primary stated reason for the Partition of Bengal in 1905 by Lord Curzon?

Which of the following events is considered the immediate trigger for the launch of the Non-Cooperation Movement by Mahatma Gandhi?

Answer 1

Non-availability of the case file is a valid ground for condonation of delay, subject to the discretion of the court.

Answer 2

Non-availability of the case file is only considered a valid ground for condonation of delay if the delay is minimal.

Answer 3

Non-availability of the case file does not constitute a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.

Answer 4

Non-availability of the case file is considered a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.

Related Practice Questions