Law · Limitation Act, 1963
According to the ruling in Collector and Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Darshan Singh and others (AIR 1999), what stance did the court take regarding the non-availability of the case file to the State counsel or Panel lawyer for condonation of delay?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Non-availability of the case file is a valid ground for condonation of delay, subject to the absolute discretion of the court.
- 2Non-availability of the case file is only considered a valid ground for condonation of delay if the delay is minimal.
- 3Non-availability of the case file does not constitute a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.✓
- 4Non-availability of the case file is considered a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.
Correct answer
Non-availability of the case file does not constitute a valid ground for condonation of inordinate delay.
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Start Free Mock Test →Preparing for Law?
Practice full-length mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Limitation Act, 1963 MCQs →Want more practice questions on Limitation Act, 1963?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Law · Limitation Act, 1963