Banking · Negotiable Instruments Act
Accommodation bills are instruments where one party lends their name to another without consideration to help raise funds. Statement I: In an accommodation bill, the accommodation party is not liable to the person accommodated because there is no consideration between them. Statement II: If a bank discounts an accommodation bill knowing it is such, the bank cannot sue the accommodation party because knowledge of the lack of consideration destroys the status of a holder in due course. Statement III: Once an accommodation bill is discounted by a bank for value, the accommodation party becomes liable to the bank just as if it were a genuine trade bill. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Verified Solution4 OptionsUpdated: October 2026👁️1 View
Share:
- 1Only I
- 2Only I and III✓
- 3Only II and III
- 4I, II and III
Correct answer
Only I and III
Download Single Question PDF
Save this question and verified answer as a clean study sheet with live clickable link.
👥
Share with Friends & Study Groups
Challenge your peer aspirants on WhatsApp or Telegram to solve this question!
Online Test Series
Preparing for Banking?
Practice full-length Banking mock tests with real exam timers, instant score analysis, and all-India ranking.
Chapter Practice
Practice Negotiable Instruments Act MCQs →Want more practice questions on Negotiable Instruments Act?
Solve complete topic-wise tests with detailed solutions on GkGet.
Related Practice Questions
Recommended practice questions in Banking · Negotiable Instruments Act