A manufacturing firm faces a sudden 30% drop in orders due to new tariffs. The production manager announces a 20% workforce reduction to adjust costs quickly, leading to worker panic and high absenteeism. The HR head, on the other hand, emails all staff asking for ideas to survive, conducts small-group discussions about temporary wage cuts, flexible hours, and retraining, and approaches a bank for a bridge loan. Morale slowly improves. After the crisis, the firm recovers faster because it retained skilled staff. In class, students discuss which approach better balances urgency with engagement. Comparing the two leadership responses mainly helps students recognise that:

Question

Accepted Answer

Effective direction in difficult times requires balancing swift action with listening to stakeholders' concerns

Answer

The best crisis response is always the cheapest one, regardless of social impact

Answer

Employee morale is irrelevant when survival costs require hard choices

Answer

Crisis situations demand quick autocratic decisions without any staff consultation

Download Single Question PDF

Share with Friends & Study Groups

Preparing for Child Development and Pedagogy?

Practice by Subject

Practice by Exam

Topic-Wise Solved Questions