A is tried for the murder of B by intentionally shooting him dead. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the fact that A, on other occasions shot at B is relevant because it shows:

In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court of India explained the point of difference between the relevancy of evidence and its admissibility?

Given below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R): Assertion (A): 'Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus' is not a rule of law, but a rule of caution. Reason (R): The rule has no application in India because it is not the duty of the court to separate the grain from the chaff. Select the correct answer using the code given below: